-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jon Portnoy wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:41:31AM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote: >> inviting community) and why you think stricter test make for better >> developers, why you think harder tests would cut down more on the quick >> in and out people. > > Empirical evidence agrees. > > Our current quiz practices have done a good job keeping out a lot of the > incompetence that used to slip through before we took that approach. > > Stricter tests make for more knowledgable developers and folks with a > lack of commitment to Gentoo are usually not willing to tackle the > learning curve. > > As for whether or not we're inviting or not, anybody can contribute. > They don't need to be @gentoo.org to do so. What we really need is to > focus more on those outside contributions. >
so that is where this is all coming from, who said that we should hand out @gentoo.org ? i never said that, they don't need it, and everyone gets to feel all special about the @gentoo.org the way they are used to, a committing contributor does not require a @gentoo.org and unless you give them a general aptitude and attitude test, you do not know a thing about the person who answered a few technical questions (more) Daniel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEU3pZ/aM9DdBw91cRArKPAKCCr/9TYUc+VTqldUueqXN5RRCUWgCfbSH8 5QfB8r0xd2qAr018yFICd9o= =aMhC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
