On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:34:52PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2006 20:11:57 +0200 Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | That's not the point as i wasn't talking about single developers but > | Gentoo as an organisation. Paludis is not in any way under Gentoo's > | control. If the paludis devs decide to change the license for paludis > | 1.0 to a commercial one, Gentoo would be unable do anything about it > | (except fork the last GPLed version). > > And what if the Bash licence changes? Or the Python licence?
That's a bit different as these are dependencies. Paludis has those too. Let's concentrate on the package manager - and as said there is no way for Gentoo to have any influence on paludis. > | If the paludis devs decide to > | terminate all ricers with RTFM, Gentoo can't do anything about it. I > | guess the list could be continued with other examples. > | I'm not saying the paludis devs may do such a thing, but they could > | and Gentoo couldn't do anything about it. > > Yes, and the Bash developers *could* decide to make new Bash versions > print out an ASCII art diagram of a BSD daemon sporking Larry. Please don't turn this in another pink elephant argument. > | As long a project is within Gentoo, every developer does at least have > | some influence, be it by voting the council or whatsoever. > > And just what do you think would happen if the council were to demand > that Portage implements a new feature? Depends - but more than if it demands a new paludis feature. > | As for your long standing feature requests, this has nothing to do > | with the issue, unless you're trying to bash the portage team, which > | has nothing to do with this thread. > > Sure it does. It's a perfect demonstration that the needs and demands > of Gentoo have no influence over what happens to Portage. Sorry, but all i see is bashing portage, and i don't really like it. cheers, Wernfried -- Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org
pgp2GVVXNSiON.pgp
Description: PGP signature