On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 02:35:53PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > Btw, the new policy also includes the possibility of refering a > > decision to the council in certain cases, see "Resolution and Appeal". > > I've read the policy.
Did i say you didn't?
> > > I'm sure nearly every member
> > > of devrel would agree that they would love to see a Gentoo where devrel
> > > simply wasn't needed.
> >
> > I assume you're only refering to conflict resolution again, and i
> > agree it would be great. I just don't think this is ever going to
> > happen as long there are more than 50 developers.
>
> Quit assuming I mean anything, you're batting zero for two right now.
What's the problem? I wasn't sure how you meant it, so i assumed you
meant it that way. As for batting zero for two, i never heard that
phrase before and have nfc what it means, but somehow that whole
statement doesn't seem very friendly to me.
> Luckily, I wasn't asking if you thought it was possible. I've merely
> been stating that it should be possible.
Perhaps i'm misreading this comment too, but i'm taking that one
personal.
Screw you guys i'm going home.
Let's not waste any more bandwidth and time on it.
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org
pgpyjT0rXzCYJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
