On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:29:32PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: > Bryan Østergaard ha scritto: > >On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:00:12PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: > >>Bryan Østergaard ha scritto: > >>>On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:46:32AM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: > >>><Snipped silly inflamatory bit> > >>>>Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto: > >>>>>It is widely perceived that Gentoo has a huge problem with slacker > >>>>>archs cluttering up the tree and making maintainers' work harder. > >>>>>Clearly, something needs to be done about this. > >>>>It's even more perceived that there are a couple of satellite people > >>>>who are working very strongly and sometimes (sadly) successfully to > >>>>create an un-healty environment for developers and users. Personally I > >>>>would mention you Caranm, beu and geoman. > >>>Please stop the personal attacks. They serve absolutely no purpose other > >>>than poisoning the developer community further. > >>> > >>>Regards, > >>>Bryan Østergaard > >>mkay, but sometimes is _really_ difficult, missing flameeyes and keep > >>geoman does not make it easyer. > >Might be dificult but maybe you could explain how it helps to bash > >geoman? A good advice before sending any mail like that is to take at > >least 10 minutes break to cool off and then read it again before sending > >it. > > > >Regards, > >Bryan Østergaard > > Bashing Stephen Becker for comments like the one you can found at > "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163795#c6"; may survive also the > 10 minutes break, even a night of sleep, and bashing is not enough. > > FYI the offence has been reiterated in #c12 still from geoman, and > enforced by ciaranm in c#16, same bug, same attitude. > I honestly find it offensive to break archs likewise. But while we can all decide to continue to be dicks over this I still completely fail to see how it *helps* solve anything. And I guess we want to solve the problems instead of just continuing the flames, right?
So please ignore previous flames and lets focus on the actual problems. Problems like MIPS being behind on some packages and latest stable or testing version getting dropped for archs quite often. That's something I'd like to see people spending their time on fixing instead of just adding fuel to the flames. Regards, Bryan Østergaard -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
