On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 16:00 +0100, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: > > Uhh, no. This gets enforced on devs and users alike. > I wouldn't bring it up in the first place, but we've had previous examples > with devs calling other devs not so kind things and to my knowledge it didn't > result in any action. I seem to remember a rather active dev taking it not so > lightly, resulting in one less dev and no action from Devrel/Council.
What exactly do previous examples have to do with us saying that our past efforts didn't work and our trying to come up with a *new* way of doing these things to not repeat past problems/mistakes? Let me just clarify this. We don't care how things were done in the past. We are looking *forward* and trying to come up with the best solution from here on out. > > I look at anything with a gentoo.org address as our house. While some > > might disagree with this statement, I'm pretty sure this is the stance > > we're taking on it. > > So this doesn't apply to the Gentoo IRC channels? *sigh* I wasn't aware that I would have to spell out everything. How about this, then? EVERYTHING with gentoo.org or #gentoo-* in it? Is that good enough? (Looking forward to the day when we don't have to be so damned pedantic in everything that we write.) -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
