Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
> So I just think something has to be changed e.g. making paludis an
> official gentoo project and mentioning it in the docs, but keep portage
> as the default pm.
> If portage can't get improved, then people have to get informed that
> there is a better alternative, because I know a lot of Gentoo users
> having never heard about paludis and I also didn't know that it even
> exists until a month ago.
> 
You (and others) should also be made aware of pkgcore then as it might turn
out from these discussions that ciaran's future contributions will not be
allowed in gentoo (unless i'm missing something.) In which case, I have no
doubt he'll fork, although I hope it doesn't come to that. (And I still
believe that situation can be avoided, with work. It shouldn't be happening
on here tho.)

I have no personal experience of using either. It would be insulting of me
to pretend that i have no personal feelings as to which dev team i prefer
tho, although i continue to have sympathy for ciaran's feelings here. I
think he has been ill-treated in the past, but that's where it should stay.

http://www.pkgcore.org/ if you want to see the other other package manager,
written by one of the (core?) portage devs. Apparently it's where a
significant percentage of the improvements to portage have started out.


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to