On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 04:35 +0000, Duncan wrote: > * "If you perceive a breach of the Code of Conduct guidelines, let the > proctors know." How? The council's email address is given for appeals, > but no general proctor address is listed. (At least none that I saw, even > after searching, so if it's there, it needs to be made rather more > prominent.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] a reasonable alias? Mentioning it right > after the above quoted sentence should work, I think.
We had no such alias made, but I'm requesting it to be done. I'll update the document accordingly once we have the alias. I also plan on making it known that users/developers should be able to also contact any of the local moderation/operation staff for the medium they're on, meaning they can contact any op in #gentoo or any moderator in the forums. There's no need to necessarily go directly to the proctors for everything. > their council term, if elected). Was that really intended? Perhaps it Yes, it was intended. Nobody on the Council should be a proctor. I think you missed that only the *initial* group of proctors includes all global moderators. By the next council meeting, we plan on having a much reduced list of proctors to serve in a more permanent role. This will *include* moderators from the forums, but not all of them. If someone runs for Council and is elected, they would give up their position as proctor (but not as a moderator/operator). Since the next Council elections aren't before the next Council meeting, this should work out just fine. ;] Basically, the chain goes like this: local moderators/operators -> proctors -> Council -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
