On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 06:34:21PM +0100, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > People reporting bugs often get annoyed when their bug is marked > INVALID; especially when they're relatively new to the Gentoo > Experience. We've all seen it many times, I'm sure. > But sometimes, just sometimes, the bugs are absolutely 100% invalid. "Emerging nano broke my apache" (random fake example with two unrelated packages)(or...are they...?) More important is to explain to the user *why* it is invalid, and leave it open to them to argue and reopen the bug. Better communication, not more convoluted closure flags, is the solution. IMHO. You know. Word.
~mcummings -- -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature.
pgpNuJuZowzge.pgp
Description: PGP signature
