On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:17:52 +0200 Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > > The problem I have with NOTABUG is pretty much the same problem I > > have with INVALID - it's not as severe, but it still does the same > > thing to the user (i.e. slaps him with a wet fish rather than a > > frozen one). > > > > > Maybe, just maybe, the problem is not with the resolution name, but > with peeps who cannot accept they could be wrong. > For the most of us, INVALID doesn't mean YOUAREAMORON. My point is that if someone raises a bug, they clearly have an issue - if they didn't, they wouldn't have raised a bug. Closing INVALID is like saying they never had an issue - when clearly they did have an issue, even if it was just an issue of understanding. > A NOTOURBUG resolution would be pointless. I cannot imagine a possible > scenario in which I could choose such resolution over the existing > ones. Probably you want it as a replacement for UPSTREAM? Er, I never suggested NOTOURBUG - as you say we already have UPSTREAM. -- Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
