On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:46:35 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:41:45 +0100 > Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How does this chord with eclasses that set EAPI, instead of ebuilds? > > Last I read was that EAPI-set-by-eclass was close to being ratified. > > Read where? So far as I'm aware, everyone's been saying "don't set > EAPI in an eclass". On this mailing list, in the "EAPI placement" thread. JeR -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list