On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:46:35 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:41:45 +0100
> Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does this chord with eclasses that set EAPI, instead of ebuilds?
> > Last I read was that EAPI-set-by-eclass was close to being ratified.
>
> Read where? So far as I'm aware, everyone's been saying "don't set
> EAPI in an eclass".
On this mailing list, in the "EAPI placement" thread.
JeR
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
