Steve Long wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> There is no duplication of information, nor redundancy. >> > So what were the QA checks you mentioned to confirm that the same EAPI is > set in both the filename and the ebuild, for-- if not integrity of > duplicated data?
+1 >> Really. It's a heck of a lot cleaner in the filename suffix. >> > Nah, it's an awful hack and you know it. It has nothing to do with package > naming and is unnecessary exposure of internal data. Yes! Thank you, Steve! -Joe -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list