Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Current state: "Deferred" > Wanted state: "Accepted/Implemented" (at least by me)
Yea, this sounds like a good thing from reading over the GLEP, unless
I'm missing some glaring problems with it.
> Open questions from last discussion (March 2006):
> - Is it possible/should it be possible to have more than one <maintainer>
> entry?
Yea, agree.
> - Is recording an upstream-status (active/inactive) a good idea?
> Possibilities:
> An element: <status>{active/inactive}</status>
> An attribute: <maintainer status="{active/inactive}">...
Definately. We have several packages in the tree that once they become
broken, we'd have to start developing ourselves. This will help the
treecleaner project as well so they can tell if a package has several
open bugs and upstream is inactive, its a very good candidate for
getting booted from the tree.
> - Is an additional <doc> element needed to link to upstream docs
Sounds reasonable.
> - Must the type of <remote-id> be controlled/listed/checked?
I'd say we should come up with a good list to start with. We can come
up with updates to the allowed values at a later date, but I do think we
should keep this under control.
--
Mark Loeser
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web - http://www.halcy0n.com
pgpPXq07yrA1j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
