On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:08:07 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does this (and previous similar threads) suggestion means that > > portage will not support GLEP 54? Or how it'll be related with said > > glep? > > It seems like GLEP 54 is intended to fill a similar gap in the > ebuild metadata. With PROPERTIES=live, it doesn't seem like GLEP 54 > will be much use since it seems like you can achieve essentially the > same results by using PROPERTIES=live together with the existing > version suffixes such as _pre and _p (to control ordering).
Er, no you can't. There is no way of using existing version components to get the correct ordering. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
