On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:39:58 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do the name and definition of this PROPERTIES=live value seem good? > Would anybody like to discuss any changes to the name, definition, > or both? Not sure if 'live' is really the best choice here, as many things also apply to e.g. automated daily/nightly snapshots/builds that might also be useful to support. Maybe 'unversioned' is more accurate. Marius
