Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
Dale wrote:
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
Dale wrote:
Philip Webb wrote:
080907 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
ignoring FHS ... are not valid solutions to this problem.
Why ? Who is demanding FHS compliance & for what reasons ?
Gentoo is not like other distros & sometimes needs to find its own
way.
Given the well-known problems with KDE 4.0 & (still) 4.1 ,
I'ld like to be able to have the option of multiple versions
available.
I really do appreciate the hard volunteer work the KDE team donates
& have nothing but thanks to them all, but shouldn't your priority be
to get KDE 4.1 into 'testing', so that users can actually try it
out ?
There's also 3.5.10 , which has been released, but isn't in Gentoo
yet.
As a lowly user, I would like to keep KDE 3.5.* for quite a while
and will most likely not switch until at least 4.3 or better is
out. Even that mostly depends on how many "issues" are still left
out there.
The slotting of KDE 3.* and KDE 4.* was never a question - these
will always remain slottable. The question is whether we really need
to keep slotting of minor KDE versions in the new 4.* line, i.e. KDE
4.1 and 4.2 slotted on the same system. I think the benefits of an
FHS compliant, non-slottable (with other KDE 4 minor versions)
install is the best thing for our general user base.
I also see how we can have slots outside of FHS for developers,
power users and the ones who just like to be different ;-) These can
be maintained in an overlay and use different slots than the ebuilds
in the main tree. It is no real issue to be able to run a slotted
KDE 4.2 install alongside an FHS install of KDE 4.* and so FHS
installs can be successfully slotted with other kdeprefix installs too.
This helps to make the normal KDE install much simpler to maintain
with less gradual build up of cruft over the years (multiple older
slots the user is no longer using). It also brings us into line with
the FHS compliant Qt 4 ebuilds and other desktops such as Gnome.
The purpose of these posts was to solicit further feedback before
things are pushed to the main tree.
Most other distributions install KDE into the main /usr hierarchy,
that is the way upstream intends KDE to be installed and I think it
will work well for most users. I do think Gentoo is about choice and
so having overlays with ebuilds in a different slot seems to be the
best solution we can offer given the constraint of slot invariance.
To try to make my point clearer, if I can set a USE flag or some
other config so that I can have both KDE 3.* and KDE 4.* installed at
the same time and select which one to login into, I'm cool. That
option doesn't have to be available forever but long enough for KDE
to get some of the "kinks" worked out. I'm talking maybe 6 months to
a year which will vary depending on the speed KDE gets things worked
out and fixed?implemented.
Your point was perfectly clear and I thought I had been clear in that
option is present and will continue to be so for as long as KDE 3.5 is
in the tree. That could be years, depending mainly upon whether
upstream continues to provide security fixes in some form.
I'm not hard to please by any means but I do like changes to not be a
overnight thing. I'm to old for things to "soak in" in a rush.
Thanks
I think we all know that most people will try KDE 4 whilst maintaining
their old KDE 3.5 desktop. I only use KDE 3.5 for testing things now
but still run quite a few KDE 3 apps in my KDE 4 desktop session. I
hope this reply makes it very clear that slotting of KDE 3.5 with with
KDE 4 is not something that is going away. You will have at least two
options (KDE 3.5 or KDE 4), some people might prefer more (KDE 3.5,
KDE 4.0, KDE 4.1, KDE 4.2, KDE 4.3...) but I think that is overkill
for most (and probably always was).
Thanks,
Marcus
I agree, having slots for 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 etc is a bit much. KDE 3 and
KDE 4 are supposed to be very different desktops. The difference
between KDE 4.1, 4.2 should only be bug fixes and adding more
features/programs.
I think I will be a happy camper after your posts. Thanks for shedding
some light on this for me, and most likely others.
Dale
:-) :-)
