David Leverton kirjoitti:
On Saturday 20 September 2008 18:15:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
I can think of checks like:
- foo is a dep/rdep of bar
- foo has a "plugin like" architecture
- bar will "work" with minimal foo
- most people will expect some features in bar that come with foo's
plugins
- we might want to display warnings for the most useful features
- having useflags in bar for each of foo's useflags doesn't seem wise

If you mean something like

built_with_use cat/foo coolfeature || ewarn "bar will be more useful if you rebuild cat/foo with USE=coolfeature"

then you can use

    has_version 'cat/foo[coolfeature]' || ...

instead.


What does this report if cat/foo does not have coolfeature use flag in some version? Meaning can this support cases which need --missing true.

Regards,
Petteri

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to