Dne úterý 17 Březen 2009 00:20:11 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:59:45 +0100 > > Maciej Mrozowski <reave...@poczta.fm> wrote: > > To avoid further confusion I'd suggest removing all traces of > > kdebuild- format and its features (like PDEPEND labels, ranged > > dependencies) from PMS document, especially its references to Gentoo > > KDE project. It has not been accepted thus should not exist in > > "Gentoo PMS" document. > > Why? It was an official EAPI agreed upon by the Gentoo KDE project. > Having it there is helpful for package manager people, and removing it > would just mean more work when features make their way into Portage. > Besides, if you really don't want to see it, you can just make it all > invisible with one easy switch. > Actualy now people expect kde team to manage support for kdebuild too. So it is not such crazy request.
> We've been over all this before. Unless you have something new to add, > kindly avoid wasting people's time. And you are not wasting others time by flaming all around glep 54. I dont mean i dont agree with the glep i just dont agree with your way promoting it. And if you say i dont have to read all the long flame around you dont have the right saying somebody else not to write his ideas on this mailing list.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
