On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:22:54 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfre...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Another possibly nicer option would be to add the feature into EAPI > > 3. However, if we're considering this, we'd have to be absolutely > > totally clear that this isn't a call to open up EAPI 3 for yet more > > changes. > > EAPI=3 can be opened also for other changes trivial to implement > (e.g. allowing bash-4.0 features).
That isn't a trivial implementation feature unless GLEP 55 is passed, since it breaks sourcing for metadata for users of older Portage versions. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
