On Tuesday 13 October 2009 22:48:01 Branko Badrljica wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 October 2009 22:36:44 Branko Badrljica wrote: > >> Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> the mailing list is not bugzilla. any complaints you have about > >>> USE=oldnet have nothing to do with this thread. it's a bug and should > >>> be treated as such. > >> > >> Which is why I have posted here to gripe about having documented such > >> changes in future. > > > > USE=oldnet is documented, end of story. you're complaining about a > > *bug*, not lack of documentation. stop mixing the two as you're only > > muddling this thread. > > Not really, but my fingers hurt. > So, let's leave it at that, you were Right(tm) and I am misguided. > I'm truly sorry for all the noise in you signal that i caused and wish > you all the best.
now that you've realized the error of your ways, i still dont see any bug reports in bugzilla about USE=oldnet. that leads me to conclude that testers have found no problems with it, only problems with USE=-oldnet. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
