Branko Badrljica schrieb: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> the mailing list is not bugzilla. any complaints you have about >> USE=oldnet have nothing to do with this thread. it's a bug and should >> be treated as such. >> -mike >> > > Which is why I have posted here to gripe about having documented such > changes in future. > > I was told that new openrc is surely fine because it works for some > group of people, that obviously includes developer. > > It is not enough, and please, don't keep such things in the future in > more or less closed circles of your pals. > > Even simple "WARNING!!! Big changes, untested, not(yet) documented!" > would be nice. > > I know what arch~ _should_ mean, but you know what it actually means. > So, a little bit of pragmatic flexibility here would certainly decrease > amount of raining urine and improve Gentoo's likability.
Using TESTING packages actually means the above big warning. But do you really want to annoy every user with such a message everywhere, just because some people expect TESTING tree to be similar save as stable tree? -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
