On Tuesday 12 January 2010 15:51:28 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Your approach of adding new packages to main tree is that you add them > with empty metadata.xml and we have to remove them in few years because > they are steaming piles of bugs...
not that this is relevant at all to my point, but when i notice such bugs, i'll fix them. but if no one cc's me, then i dont generally notice. > Lack of maintainer incorrect > open bugs are valid reasons. the *type* of bug matters, not the existence of an open bug. take any number of the trivial QA bugs open related to an extra empty dir or split docs -- none are valid for punting an otherwise perfectly working package. > And since WE want to enable as-needed as default at some time we need to > work on the bugs which isnt going to happen -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
