On 04-01-2012 19:50:24 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:18 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > >> What mistakes? > > > > > The mistake of introducing a pointless separation based on a rule of > > > thumb which becomes more and more blurry over time, and hacking > > > packages just to make it work. > > > > There's really nothing pointless or blurry about this separation. > > The FHS has a nice definition: "The contents of the root filesystem > > must be adequate to boot, restore, recover, and/or repair the system." > > Why don't we have sshd there then? I don't really feel like repairing > remote system without fallback sshd.
Network isn't typically in that bootlevel. You'd just attach through the console (netmgt, ipmi, keyboard/vga) instead. > And a compiler. If I mess up some important system component, I'd really > use one. And package manager. And backup system libraries... Time for your PXE boot from net to just bring back a sane image or so. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
