On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:00:51 +0100 Fabian Groffen <grob...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 04-01-2012 19:50:24 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:18 +0100 > > Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > >> What mistakes? > > > > > > > The mistake of introducing a pointless separation based on a > > > > rule of thumb which becomes more and more blurry over time, and > > > > hacking packages just to make it work. > > > > > > There's really nothing pointless or blurry about this separation. > > > The FHS has a nice definition: "The contents of the root > > > filesystem must be adequate to boot, restore, recover, and/or > > > repair the system." > > > > Why don't we have sshd there then? I don't really feel like > > repairing remote system without fallback sshd. > > Network isn't typically in that bootlevel. You'd just attach through > the console (netmgt, ipmi, keyboard/vga) instead. > > > And a compiler. If I mess up some important system component, I'd > > really use one. And package manager. And backup system libraries... > > Time for your PXE boot from net to just bring back a sane image or so. My PXE boot from net won't happen because possible /usr-over-NFS relies on random files from other rootfs, and they just failed to be in sync between two of my systems. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
