On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:18 +0100 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: > > >> What mistakes? > > > The mistake of introducing a pointless separation based on a rule of > > thumb which becomes more and more blurry over time, and hacking > > packages just to make it work. > > There's really nothing pointless or blurry about this separation. > The FHS has a nice definition: "The contents of the root filesystem > must be adequate to boot, restore, recover, and/or repair the system." Why don't we have sshd there then? I don't really feel like repairing remote system without fallback sshd. And a compiler. If I mess up some important system component, I'd really use one. And package manager. And backup system libraries... -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
