* Justin schrieb am 21.03.12 um 16:14 Uhr: > On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > >> On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: > >>> I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for > >>> use in other contexts without permission of the author. > > > >> Portage could be considered to be one of these contexts. > > > > > > If the entire package is installed (ie, it's not broken up into > > separate libraries or sub-packages) this would be fine (ie having the > > package in portage), wouldn't it? > > > > I guess the primary restriction here would be that nothing else would > > be allowed to link against any embedded libraries; ie, the package > > couldn't be a dep. > > > > It simply creates one binary which I am interested in. I don't see any > problem if I use fetch restriction. The only remaining question would be > the actual LICENSE?
How about asking the authors? Maybe they are fine with mirroring too if updates they publish will be mirrored too. If you get the permission to do it, it might be fine. -Marc Disclaimer: IANAL -- 0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134
pgpojGSSDhbuW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
