On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Michał Górny posted on Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:15:10 +0200 as excerpted: > > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:51:50 +0800 Ben de Groot <yng...@gentoo.org> > > wrote: > > >> When upstream moved the udev sources to the systemd repo, they > >> promised that udev would continue to be able to be used separately > >> from systemd. We should hold them to that promise. > >> > >> If they break their promise (as it seems they are bent on doing), > >> then we should go ahead with the fork as discussed earlier. I'm > >> sure other distros such as Debian and Slackware would be happy to > >> join us in that effort. > > > > If we fork, then I would expect systemd to actually require its own > > udev which means that systemd would need to build it anyway. What's > > the point? > > > Being able to choose not to run systemd at all? If there's no need > to build systemd, than what it requires is irrelevant. Who forces you to do otherwise? I really don't see what this thread is all about. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
