-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 14/01/13 09:48 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 01:25:01AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: >> William Hubbs wrote: >>> I have a bug opened with the docs team and release engineering >>> to discuss whether we want the new names for new installs. >> >> IMO yes we do. >> >> What's that bug - or what is the good way to thumbs up/down? > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451950 > > The focus of this bug really is how to document the new names in > the handbook if they decide to go that way. The problem we will > have is we don't know the names of the interfaces a user will see. >
That's easy enough to deal with -- list a code block that says what command to use to find out the iface names, and show an example of the output. For that matter, if udev-197 goes stable it'll be included on the livecd, right? So a user's interface on the livecd will already be set to the new naming scheme. ***OH***, that'll mean the livecd's config (or at least the openrc oldnet portion) is going to need some work.... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlD1Ww0ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPB/sAEAlr+wzX5X7jEsY2KkbC9hylu7 IAIyoZkbtl0A5Z+68A8BALXbRZyv+PZg1eqmWr0DNXfmdwVidOq0RISOxBt0sK7W =mTAM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
