Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013, 14:57:16 schrieb Ben de Groot: > > After some initial bikeshedding we came to the conclusion that naming > the category simply "qt" is the most elegant solution. We will then > also be dropping the qt- prefix in package names. This means > x11-libs/qt-core will be moved to qt/core, and so on. >
Please don't. This is not about standards, but about consistency. About everyone else uses the two-part category-names witha-dash. Why can't you? It is what I would immediately expect, instead of a "hyper-toplevel" "qt". My suggestion would be qt-base (analogous to kde-base, gnome-base, gnustep- base, lxde-base, and xfce-base) for everything that is part of the main Qt release. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
