On 19 January 2013 03:22, Christoph Junghans <ott...@gentoo.org> wrote: > 2013/1/17 Ben de Groot <yng...@gentoo.org>: >> After some initial bikeshedding we came to the conclusion that naming >> the category simply "qt" is the most elegant solution. We will then >> also be dropping the qt- prefix in package names. This means >> x11-libs/qt-core will be moved to qt/core, and so on. > -1 > > I don't like the idea of emerging gui instead qt-qui.
The thing is you would practically never have to do this. Users install apps that have a number of qt modules as dependencies. These qt modules in turn cannot be updated individually (unless there is an ebuild revision bump), but will be included in a world update as a group. And if you really must, is emerge qt/gui so much more difficult than emerge qt-gui? -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin
