Luca Barbato wrote: > > Users will never be satisfied. But I guess you agree that API > > compatibility will certainly avoid extra problems for users. > > It is not related to users,
I was trying to come back on topic. :) > is related to me being called as swine a traitor and having death > threats. *Slightly* less technical than discussing API. That is of course not acceptable under any circumstance. I'm sorry to hear that you had to deal with that. :( > > I don't think open source neccessarily is democracy, and of course > > a disagreement about something fairly fundamental such as that can > > be more than enough to cause a fork. > > The rules in Libav are quite well defined and decently enforced. > > Again, if you have ~15 people and one is deemed misbehaving by more > than 10, which is the fork? The fork is always the younger group, but who is "right" and "wrong" is another matter. //Peter
