On Sat, 11 May 2013 11:51:39 -0400 Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > > Fixed naming the proper default sub-phase and declaring 'edefault' > > in python_prepare_all(). > > --- > > I think I prefer to explicitly name the function I want to call, so I > don't really see any great benefit here. I'm not strongly opposed to > it, but I don't see myself using it either. Same here for the reason you mention below. Long term I expect it to be more of a hassle than typing a few additional letters now. > Also, how would this interact with other eclasses which may define a > similar "edefault" function? Packages using distutils-r1 don't often > utilize other phase-happy eclasses, but I'm sure it will happen > eventually. >
