On Wed, 1 May 2013 22:42:05 +0200 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> To make this more friendly, I would likely to locally introduce > 'edefault' function in the eclass (name can change). The function would > -- similarly to 'default' in regular phase functions -- call > the default code for the sub-phase. I've decided to withdraw the patch due to no interest from devs in the feature. If anyone feels like it would be useful, we can get back to it later. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
