On Thu, 23 May 2013 05:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> That's the point. It *IS* possible to use INSTALL_MASK sanely,
> without something breaking.
Nobody said it isn't, I agree hacks can be used without breaking
things; the point is that that doesn't make it a good idea in general.
> Applying your exact phrasing to the topic at hand: "If you really
> think[1] you can't use INSTALL_MASK without something breaking, you
> should carefully consider who is doing the screwing up."
If you really think[1] you need INSTALL_MASK for a few small files when
there are much larger consumers around, you should carefully consider
whether what you are doing is the right thing. ("OMG systemd units!")
> [1] Think: Or for that matter, demonstrate to yourself and others.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
