>>>>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, hasufell wrote: >> PMS doesn't guarantee that die works correctly in a subshell: >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12800011.3.3 >> >> So the devmanual agrees with the spec, and the eclasses need to be >> fixed.
> How does that make any sense? It makes perfect sense. The specification doesn't require that the package manager's die function works in a subshell, so ebuilds and eclasses cannot rely on such behaviour. If you want a different behaviour for future EAPIs, then PMS needs to be changed. Ulrich
