Dnia 2013-06-15, o godz. 18:25:15 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> >>>>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, hasufell wrote: > > >> PMS doesn't guarantee that die works correctly in a subshell: > >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12800011.3.3 > >> > >> So the devmanual agrees with the spec, and the eclasses need to be > >> fixed. > > > How does that make any sense? > > It makes perfect sense. The specification doesn't require that the > package manager's die function works in a subshell, so ebuilds and > eclasses cannot rely on such behaviour. > > If you want a different behaviour for future EAPIs, then PMS needs to > be changed. And there's a bug open for it already: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465008 -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
