-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:41:18 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 06/15/2013 06:24 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > Why not fix the specs? > > from council log > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20120911.txt > > <Chainsaw> Okay for EAPI 5. *Nothing* gets applied retroactively. > *EVER* > > So that means some people think it doesn't even matter what the issue > is. We never fix the spec, we just enhance it. > > Oh, you asked for reasoning...
If you want the reasoning for that decision, you should look at the entire log, and not just one line of it. - -- Ciaran McCreesh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlG8mb0ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFoiQCaA5Y+T4UY2lvzGFg8VZXcl4df 0VMAoJf2dqE3T6ztIKCaMc/jXzTUxJOw =bD6A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
