On 01/08/13 19:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 01-08-2013 a las 18:11 +0200, Luca Barbato escribió: >> On 01/08/13 17:36, Michał Górny wrote: >>> So esystemd and ekmod now? >> >> You know my stance on systemd, for me it is a jumble of bad and >> interesting ideas not so soundly implemented, I do not have much time or >> will to play with that thing. >> >> kmod on the other hand had a pressing issue and getting it fixed-ish >> took about an evening while having Federico see around it. >> >> lu >> > > But, what are the advantages of putting a lot of effort in keeping > static libs for udev?
A lot of effort means not using random-clashing-names, not keeping functions around just because. > Looks like nothing really need them, and even > Debian (that doesn't use systemd by default) drops them Robbat said he wants to keep the stuff working, thus I lent him an hand while introducing a friend to a small codebase with a good number of practices I consider faulty but sort of easy to fix. lu
