On 9 August 2013 21:57, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Dnia 2013-08-09, o godz. 13:45:25 > Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): > >> On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:39:08 +0800 >> Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> > On 08/09/2013 07:26 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: >> > > On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:31:22 +0800 >> > > Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > > >> > >> You just removed the upgrade path for users. >> > > >> > > The upgrade path is to install systemd or to implement openrc >> > > support. >> > > >> > Invalid upgrade path. >> > >> > "The upgrade path is to install Fedora" is about as reasonable, and >> > also not acceptable. >> >> Your upgrade path is no longer an upgrade; the other ones are, and as >> said before, running Gentoo has no implication that OpenRC must be ran. > > I can think of at least a few examples where 'upgrade path' actually > involved replacing one package with another and yet nobody complains > about that. > > This one is *so special* just because we have a few folks which really > have nothing useful to do and instead spit their systemd hatred on > gentoo-dev@ and expect others to join their stupid vendetta.
Please keep your insults off this list. You may want to deny them, but there are valid reasons why people oppose systemd. It doesn't help to keep so aggressively pushing it. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer
