-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:28:15 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I see a few issues with ~arch -> table migrations: > #1 - things just sit in ~arch. The auto-stablereq script should help > with this one I think; we should give it some time to see if it works > out. That script has been running for long enough now. It doesn't work out... > #2 - the inter-related'ness of packages You can file STABLEREQ bugs for other packages, just not CC arches; if you state you need it stable for some other package, I think the maintainer isn't going to make a problem out of it. Unless there is one or another problematic bug blocking it; in which case, collaboration between the devs to get both packages stabilized indeed seems like a nice idea. I think this already happens naturally... Here's another point: #3 - There is a lack of manpower and resources on the arch teams. Recruiting more people to the arch teams is one possibility, but will we manage to get enough people; that's hard to tell, if we don't manage to, I responded on the main thread with a crowd sourcing idea. - -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSE8P1AAoJEJWyH81tNOV9fPsIAJoITcPXkAITg+qYiudf2jeN 9IcGbKs6F7B5VZiHlizyC5G+J6aLuHcdlYdRgkPteNbh0me/iujfsCeIpawBcY9r UgviVkCQ39WzO7zxA9neXXHednuCQOXpfuUSHDcqtQnj3zHpMSVgdO+JWU1/CTwB gDpxYHTbaNvHsQQX+u2cOpGkvpNAwTu/bJF6G1FEzEsdfz9KPUBaabgfwT9OacKH FMZ4lcV/8+/olr6d8y+2+xIw5OOyYB7WS5LYpdqBX6UpikzqxTshx1PZPc1jQTIg ZrqrovYmBndX3i4o3XtDfYeEcCVzufP71wHoOzCbOUdUX1kU0QBViswjQaIV87Q= =E16V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
