-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:56:13 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 13/01/14 09:46 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:37 +0700 "C. Bergström" > > <cbergst...@pathscale.com> wrote: > > > >> Long term the API to pkgcore could be beneficial, but again I'm > >> not sure it's a game changer for users. > > > > Long term, we should have an independent API backend that tools > > can query; not rewrite our tools every time users want to use them > > with a different package manager. > > ..you mean, define the API and include it in PMS? how much > bureaucracy will that need to occur? The API can be separate of the PMS. The bureaucracy needed for an API to provide to tools, that doesn't need as much involvement as PMS. - -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS1AbYAAoJEJWyH81tNOV90DEIAIk+zQe4vgJ2XWchQLET064Q mij/sQQRcI52PZwXFfRh23G+dKkywsPIg+US5KmbWJTtT4UbbLFnn4KCRB/QZE6E 43wHYsKGMgTovpkXQZEy8O4GbFUOb1k9DrsR05r91+QUUUmxxxi9ODq86kavtPVs UaPyz3me4j3olHLSxzUtxJd5/AgHGwkH+YHtcWny2oaXNUIFpusIPRURqyFyE4xI Leq/w8/nsmeCc25pPN4cbY6bBwOwCxsZZwik3gmz6FzrAVwCjuRvX8n7szl8viNr Kd56odFjX/n7pAL+Rj52spz6TNcSe1H8IMkwI9rMYc/LYQSw+/uCGnAXeIxrzWY= =F2d3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
