On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:43:57 -0500 Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> It's attempting to fix a headache with a bullet. The arch teams are > lagging behind, you're annoyed, I get it. Give 'em hell. But don't > break stable to make a point. > > For users, both options are worse than the status quo. When you do nothing then things are bound to get worse, under the assumption that manpower doesn't change as well as the assumption that the queue fills faster than stabilization bugs get added to it. As a result of this, stable will eventually become broken. It is up to you as well as us whether to consider it to be broken right now. Will it be in a month from now? What about in a year? Will we wait for hell? Or try to prepare and/or fix it now? Maybe there are other options if these can be deemed as being worse. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
