On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:17:35 -0500 "Anthony G. Basile" <bluen...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 07:06 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 00:49:28 schrieb Tom Wijsman: > >> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:37:19 -0600 > >> > >> William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >>> Thoughts? > >> In this situation, I see three opposite ends of choices: > >> > > Here's another idea: > > > > 4. Friendly ask the arch teams / make a policy that @system > > packages come first. > > > > (maybe these stable requests could be marked "major" in bugzilla > > then?) > > > > > > Actually that's a very good idea. In fact, since those are the > critical packages we can have the arch teams focus on them, and allow > more relax policies of stabilization on less critical packages. Besides allowing certain packages to be set a higher policy, we could also recommend that maintainers lower it if needed; for example: If I want to stabilize some plugin, it doesn't really have to be put "Normal" you know; I wouldn't bother it to be "Enhancement". -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature