Dnia 2014-01-17, o godz. 17:51:41
Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> napisał(a):

> Michał Górny wrote:
> > What do you think?
> 
> Excellent. I think it could quickly become the prefered protage
> storage format, although a loopback mount is needed.

You can use sys-fs/squashfuse :).

Though honestly I'd prefer if portage was able to take squashfs image
path in repos.conf and mount it locally for build-time. This will have
the extra advantage that we wouldn't have to worry about remounting it
after sync.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to