Michał Górny wrote: > > > What do you think? > > > > Excellent. I think it could quickly become the prefered protage > > storage format, although a loopback mount is needed. > > You can use sys-fs/squashfuse :). > > Though honestly I'd prefer if portage was able to take squashfs image > path in repos.conf and mount it locally for build-time. This will have > the extra advantage that we wouldn't have to worry about remounting it > after sync.
Or read it directly without mounting. //Peter
pgpVeLJOgAY6E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
