Dnia 2014-07-22, o godz. 00:13:13 Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> > On 21/07/14 23:56, Michał Górny wrote: > > Now... whether dynamic deps are technically the right thing to do is > > another > > question. It merits discussion, but we need to be really sure about the > > consequences of any change. > > Yes, it does. I'm not sure if it leads anywhere, though. Dynamic deps > > are a pipe dream. You can't implement them properly, so we're using > > half-working implementation as an excuse to be lazy. > > What's lazy is maintainer doing revision bump without thinking > if it's really required, spreading his laziness upon every users > machine (by triggering revision bump driven rebuild) Yes, users much more prefer random breakage over time. And debugging the issues save us a lot of time! -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
