Dnia 2014-09-15, o godz. 07:21:35 Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> On Sunday 14 September 2014 15:42:15 hasufell wrote: > > Patrick Lauer: > > >> Are we going to disallow merge commits and ask devs to rebase local > > >> changes in order to keep the history "clean"? > > > > > > Is that going to be sane with our commit frequency? > > > > You have to merge or rebase anyway in case of a push conflict, so the > > only difference is the method and the effect on the history. > > > > Currently... CVS allows you to run repoman on an outdated tree and push > > broken ebuilds with repoman being happy. Git will not allow this. > > iow, git doesn't allow people to work on more than one item at a time? > > That'd mean I need half a dozen checkouts just to emulate cvs, which somehow > doesn't make much sense to me ... I'd appreciate if you reduced FUD to minimum. What hasufell meant is that you normally don't have three year-old files lying around in checkout because you did 'cvs up -dP' in another directory. With git, you update everything. What you do locally, is totally unrelated. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
