-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 11.06.2015 11:16, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:43:10 +0200 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > >> Hi, The number of EAPI 1 ebuilds in the Portage tree has >> decreased to a total of 60, corresponding to 0.16 %. >> >> We briefly discussed in the QA team if we should demote EAPI 1 >> in layout.conf from "eapis-deprecated" to "eapis-banned". This >> would have the consequence that repoman would refuse to commit >> packages containing such ebuilds. AFAICS there would be no impact >> on users. >> >> What do you think? > > > are those 60 ebuilds best visible ones ? better convert the last > few remaining so that best visible one is not eapi1 before banning > it > > my bet would be that those 60 ebuilds are from packages barely > maintained, and i doubt banning their eapi will improve that, > rather the contrary > > Alexis. >
Here's a list of all remaining ebuilds: https://bpaste.net/show/dca95bc1e22b There's also a tracking bug available: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512122 Cheers, Manuel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVeWtDXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4MDA1RERERkM0ODM2QkE4MEY3NzY0N0M1 OEZCQTM2QzhEOUQ2MzVDAAoJEFj7o2yNnWNcr9oP/A8zz9fR1T7ezZwpAzQyTRi2 DfRg9RVMOZUcmOkysFulgQ0kDXiYqXExJuakt7TjKyeLLS+0/I+jMlG8flsBK5/K zvuYxncNhOBq1LRpEu9g9+XisH05EzQUksNNd9732eozbUbNjmHSO3d3oOmmr4qK RHVYy5EM3MKHfQVrbjsMDjH/a51rARBYdh4u2Fao5lWYZbH8hsCdreHswI2C8VgQ t+TMMW+KQMqG3cs30o/pcuoc/JckBstJ67R5qqmo0GCAfSaWLgOioPsCQKnhYt7J bpo2khdx2O0ncUULmnEtQ1+V/LYzUdnXHU8QIKBEIhvmJKt+RLVKFAvQZ4h0CpPL szKuxcomI5rHDq1kTWp+CLECVRbb8bQTpRvdWFo68qbDJnoUfyog+2h6wmrtRLVK G1zeO9rlGhtqa1EAdnSwOwWOnIPnDP4sx5pev1A9GfVjz7/jdlCceZahJsVHS6xG Iy+gnKqF2gAVXV2DWwbXTQsDoHGrfIwO0Tk3wU+03XBTishYBTsNmDpZYAWHNCaJ fmq1nF3MvSiVBG5cCy7RcMgRADh2Qmc5TwyqSRH/O5XmQS3/q6BNlMr53ErCYD+I UFYPhZ/dzlUDjfJ9W7Ibrh3gTzPmK6AJdKx9rMMuzxzhn4qcgC6aPGRUCPfzrKRk 9/hQW9JSVVbr1CE4YReN =iC5/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
