On 09/10/2015 08:15 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > To my knowledge, the gtk3 version of spacefm *did* indeed have less > functionality, at first. I think they're mostly the same nowadays, > though.
That's why spacefm ebuild did not switch to gtk3 when gtk3 support was still experimental. > That said, I wasn't saying gtk3 support was lacking. But if > our package supports less things than upstreams, we're not shipping > /as complete/ a package. > This sentiment is very confusing. Not even spacefm provides all available configure switches as USE flags and I am glad that it does not. > > tldr: If the problem is USE flags, let's talk USE flags. If it's > supporting more than one toolkit in general, I see no reason not to > let maintainers use their discretion and not force their hand in > either direction. > We have provided several arguments here repeatedly.
