-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 11/02/2015 01:26 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 02/11/15 09:07, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On 11/01/2015 12:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: >>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for >>> pull requests and code review and such, so I have set up a >>> Phabricator instance against gentoo.git to see how a free >>> alternative might work. >>> >>> ... >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >> >> Thanks for working on this. I personally didn't like Phabricator >> very much when I used it, but I'm glad someone is trying out >> code review platforms. I could live with it. >> >> The big question for me is, does the apache user have write >> access to the gentoo.git repo? If it does, are we all >> comfortable with allowing a bajillion-line PHP application >> unchecked access to our repo? That's the serious problem I see >> with Gerrit, Gitlab and the rest. > > It supports repository hosting, but that is optional. I too prefer > the idea of keeping the repo and other tools separate, so the demo > is running again plain anongit (and that seems to work fine). > >
The way I see it, keeping review and committing/pushing separate is a good thing, and removes a lot of the concerns about hosting a review platform as it is sufficient with read-access to repositories. Thanks for showing at least one of the alternatives. - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWN19KAAoJECULev7WN52FvxYH/1KgehSRWz7YOBAKY3X6J1Zl qLXYiuUZNA7wI4sI4a4u6YCOdfkTeiKGLiUs54ZD8l2Ne2rpxt0sbK+yoOx3nL4D CbC1Gb2MdyaWrDki/6MaocrjmCN0KuPoGSP2STaJp4Ss+zZNPZsJZe5sPrMlUs71 RiSr+CdpKDfTOhN7ZN96QbpEQPLYZRKviByuvuymS7iL1gWRF/fnISmVbDghXija fyDSN05WAOSGjNnDrWWtCIcnCf+ledFRPcKuhNhitt60axgXqo7qYKOb6ZGF1dwl vzFpt5Msvj73Jptey8b1MkgAC7p1ahP2UCcVwq7QYKl95m0Te9obnaZqoZ3o/Sg= =Mgsu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
