On 02/14/2016 09:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 14 Feb 2016 11:41, Brian Dolbec wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:00:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: >>>> If, for any reason, eudev should be abandoned - we can just change >>>> the virtual back. One-line change. >>> Which is precisely the corresponding argument for not switching the >>> default to eudev in the first place. >> OH, my, this is looking more like you are being paid by systemd peeps... > honestly ? cut the crap man. > >> You are just refusing to acknowledge these simple facts. >> >> systemd.................: irrelevant to this decision >> >> standalone systemd-udev.: Vehemently unsupported, support for its >> capability to exist is planned to be punted >> in the future. >> >> eudev...................: fully functional, actively developed, >> and fully supported, mature project, been >> around for years. > udev: it's the default in every major distro that everyone tests and > develops against. Not the standalone config we're using, so if you remove all systemd-using distros which are irrelevant to this discussion you end up with gentoo, and ~15 distros that use eudev. And of course other irrelevant weirdos that use mdev, vdev etc. > > eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it. No one runs udev either. So that's a non-argument
So given the context of this discussion, and your ignorant contribution ... maybe you should cut the crap, man. Being a bit more polite wouldn't be wrong either.
